 |
Aaron Greenspan
This morning, Alexandra Merz quote-tweeted a screenshot of my response that some account had posted in reply to her. 44 people responded. Then, for some reason, she deleted it.
In addition, as I expected would happen, Elon Musk has weighed in on Twitter to express his agreement with her video assailing Chancellor McCormick.
Why do I care? Because Chancellor McCormick is one of the only judges I've come across who is patient enough and detail-oriented enough to wade through thousands of pages of facts and lies and reach the correct conclusion most of the time, even when the parties involved are wealthy beyond imagining. And because I am genuinely concerned—and I know I'm not the only one—that the mob scrutiny Musk and his followers gin up is actually dangerous.
Meanwhile, it's obvious that Merz's and now Musk's purported concerns are much ado about nothing. McCormick addressed the insane notion that a deposition transcript was modified herself. She was extremely patient and clear. I'm not sure what more anyone could ask for. You can read the case documents here:
 CONF ORD 7.25.2023/Kevin Kulak v. Itshak ("Itzik") On, Court of Chancery of Delaware Case No. 2023-0011-KSJM
Once again, this case has absolutely nothing to do with Tesla, Elon Musk, or any issue related to them. Zero. It's just a random case.
Merz's followers think she should call the police and get a restraining order against me because I politely suggested via e-mail that she should take down her video in which she makes false and totally misleading statements. Things are pretty broken when the reflexive answer to a reasonable e-mail is police involvement, but sure, whatever, go ahead. You do you. I'm sure the police will get right on it, because, after all, according to Omar Qazi, I am an "extremely dangerous criminal." What was that about "free speech?"
Lunatics.
|
|
January 12, 2025 at 11:54 AM EST •  Reply |
Get E-Mail Alerts
