Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division, et al., Petitioners v. BNSF Railway Company, et al.

Name: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division, et al., Petitioners v. BNSF Railway Company, et al. :: Supreme Court of the United States :: Administrative Proceeding No. 09-1477
Creator: Supreme Court of the United States
Published: 2010-06-04
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
Keywords: court documents, legal case, docket, PACER, Supreme Court of the United States

Administrative Proceeding Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 09-1477

No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.

Parties

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division, et al., Petitioner

▼ Represented by Law Offices of John O'Brien Clarke , Jr.

Name	Phone	Fax	E-Mail

John O'Brien Clarke, Jr.	+1 202 296 8500	+1 202 296 7143	jclarke@highsaw.com

BNSF Railway Company, Respondent

▼ Represented by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

Name	Phone	Fax	E-Mail

David M Pryor	+1 817 352 2286	+1 817 352 2399	david.pryor@bnsf.com

Gary Giron, in his capacity as Secretary of the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Respondent

▼ Represented by Sutin, Thayer & Browne, PC

Name	Phone	Fax	E-Mail

Paul G. Bardacke	+1 505 883 2500	+1 505 888 6565	pgb@sutinfirm.com

Attributes

Lower Court	United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Lower Court Case No(s).	08-2232
Lower Court Decision Date	3/2/2010

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

5	Filed: 10/4/2010, Entered: None
	Petition DENIED.


4	Filed: 7/14/2010, Entered: None
	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 27, 2010.


3	Filed: 7/2/2010, Entered: None
	Waiver of right of respondent Gary Giron, in his capacity as Secretary of the New Mexico Department of Transportation to respond filed.


2	Filed: 6/15/2010, Entered: None
	Waiver of right of respondent BNSF Railway Company to respond filed.


1	Filed: 6/2/2010, Entered: None
	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 6, 2010)

Statistics

This case has been viewed 16 times.


Issues	Laws	Cases	Pro	News	Firms	Entities